Would you like to see an "anti-Legacy" stable?

**BigDaddyCool** · 02-27-2009, 09:33 AM

Well, yes the would have to go on to other things, but the stable's mission has been accomplished if all they are is an anti-Legacy stable, therefore there is no reason to keep them together afterwards. It is like running an anyone but Bush campain, it doesn't work long term. My argument isn't against forming stables, I love stables with goals of dominating and taking titles. But groups of guys slapped together to defeat another stable never really works.

Also, why would you insert a group of 3 or 4 guys (I'm assuming that is the size of the stable) all into the same IC title scene once the fued was done?

I guess I'm saying your idea here is very myopic.

02-27-2009, 09:33 AM	#23
BigDaddyCool Pelvic Sorcerer Posts: 64,762	Well, yes the would have to go on to other things, but the stable's mission has been accomplished if all they are is an anti-Legacy stable, therefore there is no reason to keep them together afterwards. It is like running an anyone but Bush campain, it doesn't work long term. My argument isn't against forming stables, I love stables with goals of dominating and taking titles. But groups of guys slapped together to defeat another stable never really works. Also, why would you insert a group of 3 or 4 guys (I'm assuming that is the size of the stable) all into the same IC title scene once the fued was done? I guess I'm saying your idea here is very myopic.