What was a bigger mess: TNA in general or WCW 99-01

**Casey Jones** · 04-20-2009, 09:37 PM

I'd say both are/were an equal mess.

WCW suffered from the fact that they didn't push new stars...similar to what the WWE are going through now.

TNA suffers from the fact that they offer no unique value proposition. There is almost nothing unique/interesting about TNA other than the fact that they have a six-sided ring. Instead of pushing newer talents and wrestlers, TNA keeps pushing guys that are WWE rejects.

TNA should look at how Paul Heyman ran ECW for a good example of how a small company, with a small budget, can bring something unique to the table. Yes - Paul Heyman made many mistakes, the being unique and offering the fans something different, was not one of them.

04-20-2009, 09:37 PM	#6
Casey Jones Bringing Logic Back Posts: 184	I'd say both are/were an equal mess. WCW suffered from the fact that they didn't push new stars...similar to what the WWE are going through now. TNA suffers from the fact that they offer no unique value proposition. There is almost nothing unique/interesting about TNA other than the fact that they have a six-sided ring. Instead of pushing newer talents and wrestlers, TNA keeps pushing guys that are WWE rejects. TNA should look at how Paul Heyman ran ECW for a good example of how a small company, with a small budget, can bring something unique to the table. Yes - Paul Heyman made many mistakes, the being unique and offering the fans something different, was not one of them.