What is next for Shawn Michaels?

[Casey Jones]

[QUOTE]

Originally Posted by Noid The WWE are building up other talent, dick. Matt Hardy has never looked so fucking credible.

And again...you miss the point you moron.

THERE IS NO POINT IN MAKING SOMEONE LOOK CREDIBLE IF IT ULTIMATELY DOES NOT MATERIALIZE. Stop. Re-read that sentence. Now read it again.

Your argument is completely predicated on the idea that the WWE does a good job of elevating talent...when this is clearly not the case. Again - look at Chavo Guerrero as an example (when he beat Rey Mysterio). Look at how the WWE screwed up with Rey Mysterio, Eddie Guerrero, and Chris Benoit.

The WWE's main goal should be in trying to create PERMANENT main-eventers....not temporary and transitional champions....and this has been their biggest fault.

Your post suggests that you expect the WWE to make Matt Hardy into a long-term main-eventer based on his recent actions. Given the WWE's track record however, this is not the case.

Jack Swagger won the ECW Title after four months. Evan Bourne and John Morrison, two relatively young guys just had what could end up being the free televised Match of the Year. Mr. Kennedy will be returning soon.

Not enough people care about ECW to respect Swagger's accomplishment. The moment Swagger steps on to RAW or Smackdown, he won't have anywhere near the "credibility" that you are suggesting.

As far as Morrison and Bourne goes - again....no one watches ECW. The WWE are at fault for not putting a match like that on RAW, while you are at fault for thinking that enough people will see/know about that match.

You once again prove that you are a moron.

CM Punk won the past two MITB Ladder Matches. He's like the defending champion of that match now. When he cashes in the briefcase successfully, and is a three-time World Champion, he will boost the stock of the match instead of just filling one of its slots. Punk wanting to win his third adds drama to that match.

It doesn't "add to the drama" you stupid pissant.

BEING A PART OF MITB ONLY RE-ITERATES THE FACT THAT YOU ARE A MID-CARDER OR ARE A VETERAN PUTTING OVER YOUNGER TALENT

Stop. Re-read that sentence again.

Being a MITB champ is the modern day equivalent of being a King of the Ring champion. The winner should only be a guy that is on the verge of rising....and it serves no purpose to have the same guy win it back to back years, since it doesn't allow other new guys to use that 'title' as a stepping stone.

Since you seem to have a hard on for Evan Bourne, I would argue that a guy like Evan Bourne should win MITB next year.

There is no shortage of guys who can fill the title matches for WrestleMania.

Umm....actually there is you ignorant and stupid fuck.

One of the WWE's biggest problems right now is that no legit, non-transitional, main-eventers have been created in years. Guys like Rey Mysterio, Chris Benoit, and Eddie Guerrero do NOT count since they ultimately ended up in the same spot as they started out.....and never ascended back to that level.