![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who do you like more? | |||
| Bret Hart |
|
39 | 45.35% |
| Shawn Michaels |
|
47 | 54.65% |
| Voters: 86. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#81 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Posts: 6,269
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
GO HABS GO!
Posts: 4,018
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Are you honestly trying to imply that Bret could stop Vince from going through with his edgier direction? If so, that says a lot about Vince.
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
GO HABS GO!
Posts: 4,018
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well he was certainly one of them. Bigger than Michaels, whose popularity certainly faded the further north you went up on a map.
Watching the thousands cheer Sid on in MSG as he dethrones HBK is a beautiful thing to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In late 1991, it was widely reported in the wrestling "insider" media of the time that reigning WWF Intercontinental champion Bret Hart had verbally agreed to a deal with WCW that included showing up on WCW TV with the I-C belt, mainly in retaliation to Ric Flair's NWA title shenanigans on WWF TV at the time.
The deal was nixed when it emerged that due to the terms of Bret's contract, he was not legally able to appear for WCW until his soon-to-expire WWF contract was up. WWF immediately had Bret drop the I-C title on a house show to the Mountie. Eventually they were able to convince Bret to return and re-sign with the company, but the very fact that Bret had a verbal commitment to show up to WCW with the I-C belt goes to show just how "honorable" he is. Funny how he neglected to mention this turn of events in his autobiography, and not surprising that Vince McMahon should have concerns surrounding Bret defecting with the belt when a similar circumstance arises a few years later. |
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Yeah, Michaels is still going. Yeah, he's fresh to those young and old. Yes, Hart is some washed up cripple only rabid Canadians give a shit about. But really? Obviously Bret would win? Based on wishful thinking? Or maybe that the majority of TPWW's Kliq hadn't been born yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
However, there is a reason the greatest wrestling promoter of all time felt that both the Harts weren't good for business.
LAWL. |
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Doin' It Right
Posts: 35,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
LAWL
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Bringin' Back The Sexy
Posts: 8,470
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
LAWL dustin
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Doin' It Right
Posts: 35,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
lulz
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |
|
Inconceivable
Posts: 9,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Why did they have him drop the belt if it was just an unfounded rumor? Maybe Vince heard the rumors and thought they were true. I don't know, but a lot of things have been widely reported and not even close to true. Maybe Bret started the rumors himself to get more money on his next contract. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
James, you're adorable. Don't ever change.
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
He may bleat about "always being loyal" to the company, but simply working somewhere for a number of consecutive years doesn't neccessarily equate to loyalty. Bret's loyalty mainly laid with his wallet and his ego. |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
As over as Crystal Pepsi
Posts: 21,639
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
However, it doesn't take one thing to be a better promoter. Vince is overall better than anyone else in the past 50 years. You want proof? TNA is the second biggest wrestling promotion in the USA. Let's compare TNA to WWE. "what about WCW? Or ECW? Or World Class? Or AWA?" Yea, all property of WWE now. There is no better wrestling promoter, regardless of how business may look today, than Vincent Kennedy McMahon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
LOL 450.
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Kane Knight, instead of LOL and LAWLing like a jackass please tell me who is a better wrestling promoter than Vince McMahon.
|
|
|
|
|
#100 | |
|
Inconceivable
Posts: 9,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 |
|
Posts: 6,269
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You HBK marks are just lucky I have my own battles to deal with right now, or I'd be sharpshooting all of you. But I may be back. For now, I will just say: Everything any Shawn Michaels fan posts on here is bullshit.
Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
|
yes. yes. yes.
Posts: 2,753
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
True or not, even as a 11 year old, I thought it strange that Bret got the WWF title like that. You've enlightened me today, thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
GO HABS GO!
Posts: 4,018
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Carl is a liar, his first title win was on a freakin non televised card against Flair, who was apparently in the dog house at the time due to Vince being unhappy with him. Bret was their man, he got the belt.
Bret was never considering any wcw contracts, because he never received any up until 1996. |
|
|
|
|
#104 | |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Flair wasn't in the dog house so much as he was injured (ear drum). Believe it or not, Vince's initial plan was to have Ric Flair drop the strap to "El Matador" Tito Santana. You say that Bret was never considering WCW contract offers because he never received any until 1996. This is simply not correct. NWA/WCW courted Bret (as part of the Hart Foundation) on a few occasions in the late 80s, again in late 1991, again late 1992, and every subsequent year until they snared him in 1997. And as I say, he verbally accepted a WCW deal in 1991 when he thought he legally could, but it turned out he was unable to do so in accordance with his running WWF deal. Last edited by NeanderCarl; 06-28-2009 at 09:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT
Posts: 2,957
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
proof?
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Lord of the Underworld!
Posts: 79
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
dave ain't here?
Posts: 2,709
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
HBK/Bret, never fails.
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Steele's got a point. If I keep acting like a jackass, someone will confuse me for the Kliq.
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
GO HABS GO!
Posts: 4,018
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Yeah, like someone before me asked, where's the proof of all this? Because not once before has any of this ever been mentioned, by any single individual. Even if wcw wanted the Hitman, Bret never stated that he once remotely considered their offers, until his actual wwf contract with that very company was up in 96. BTW, Bret then turns down 3 million bucks base salary to take a longer deal, yet much less financially speaking. So whatever the wcw was offering in the early 90's, when Bret wasn't nearlly as big as he was years later, doesnt seem to be all that tempting, or believable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
|
Posts: 5,629
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have never seen anything, anywhere that indicated Hart was leaving for WCW in late 1991, causing him to drop the belt to the Mountie.
Also, the only person I've ever heard claim that Tito Santana was going to get the strap in late 1992, was Santana himself. |
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The info came from the dirtsheets at the time, mainly Meltzer, who is usually pretty reliable.
I've heard the Santana story a few times, and it is mentioned in Bret's book but I don't think he names Santana specifically. |
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And also why is it so hard for people to believe that WCW made plays for Bret Hart prior to 1996? Of course they made several attempts to sign him, why wouldn't they have? They'd have been fools not to try to snare Bret (one of the better workers in the business, and a WWF Superstar™) whenever his contract came around.
I could understand people struggling to believe that Mr. Morality agreed to dump on the IC title on WCW TV - and as it is speculative you never know whether or not he would have actually gone through with it - but the mere suggestion that WCW negotiated with him several times prior to 1996 shouldn't be a point of contention but more common sense, even if you never saw the reports at the time. |
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Posts: 5,629
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm not denying that WCW attempted to court Bret before 1996. I'm just saying I had never heard that he had verbally agreed to a deal with WCW when his contract came up at the end of '91.
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A similar situation occured in 1990 too. Jim Neidhart had been fired whilst one half of the WWF World tag team champions The Hart Foundation, and made to drop the titles to The Rockers at a TV taping. So Bret and Jim negotiated to move over to WCW where they were reportedly going to wrestle under the name The Pink And Black Attack.
Pretty soon, Vince rehired Neidhart and smoothed things over, and The Harts were reinstated as champions with the title change never aired, and the explanation given that the ring rope (legit) broke during the match rendering the result void. |
|
|
|
|
#116 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Not that you're wrong, but it makes sense to be skeptical of such information, especially in an instance like this where the information seems to be poorly sourced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If Meltzer is a poor source then most insider wrestling news for the last 25 years has been "poorly sourced".
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
"Poorly sourced," Carl. The problem isn't with Meltzer, it's with you. I mean, you could say it came from Dave, Bret Hart, or Jesus....
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well I don't happen to have a link to a 1991 story, understandably. It's one of those "benefit of the doubt" deals, unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Right.... best I can find right now is an archive of an early internet insider reporter named Herb Kunze, who it appears was reporting insider wrestling news on the earliest traces of the internet as far back as the late 80s.
His sources seem to be mainly the dirt sheets of the time, and principally Meltzer and the Observer. He reported the following on Jan 30th 1992: Quote:
It is the best source I can find right now, short of digging up old magazines et al. |
|
|
|