TNA Thread 8-27-09

**NoRoolz** · 08-30-2009, 05:35 AM

iMPACT! was good, again.

Liked the opening segment with Kip James, Foley segment was funny. I'm already excited at the prospect of Hamada/Kong. Match-quality is a hell of a lot better than in WWE, and some storylines look interesting.

Fuck, I really don't think the TNA-abuse is warranted any more. Admittedly, there's a shit load that could be better and they do some unnecessary and stupid shit. But so do WWE, and the match-quality like 70% of the time is a lot better in TNA.

I can't be fucked to go too far into it because I enjoy iMPACT! and really that's what matters, and there's no chance of convincing half of the TNA hate-bandwagoners to open their deluded eyes, but I just find that every week I think TNA's improving and does a lot of entertaining segments/feuds/matches, and they deserve just as much credit as criticism.

Also, to anyone a bit clued up, does TNA really beat WWE ratings here in the UK?

08-30-2009, 05:35 AM	#32
NoRoolz dave ain't here? Posts: 2,709	iMPACT! was good, again. Liked the opening segment with Kip James, Foley segment was funny. I'm already excited at the prospect of Hamada/Kong. Match-quality is a hell of a lot better than in WWE, and some storylines look interesting. Fuck, I really don't think the TNA-abuse is warranted any more. Admittedly, there's a shit load that could be better and they do some unnecessary and stupid shit. But so do WWE, and the match-quality like 70% of the time is a lot better in TNA. I can't be fucked to go too far into it because I enjoy iMPACT! and really that's what matters, and there's no chance of convincing half of the TNA hate-bandwagoners to open their deluded eyes, but I just find that every week I think TNA's improving and does a lot of entertaining segments/feuds/matches, and they deserve just as much credit as criticism. Also, to anyone a bit clued up, does TNA really beat WWE ratings here in the UK?