![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As much as I would like there only to be one Women's champion, there really can't be if they have two shows that are separate entities. Otherwise you end up with one roster overloaded with Divas and one roster with a few Divas who occasionally have matches just for the hell of it, but with no real point to it because ultimately there is no belt on the show. They're being pushed as legitimate competitors now, so you can't have them feuding over Al Wilson's corpse.
Basically the same thing with tag teams. Why would you put a tag team on your show if you had no tag belts? Both shows need a set of tag belts, or the tag belts need to be interchangeable as they are now. Again, same with a mid-card title. Both shows need one. ECW is excluded because its roster is far too small to warrant having such a title and the show is only an hour. You'd basically be giving the title to guys who have been there four weeks. It would be a training wheels title. We need to accept that the old model of "One world title, mid-card title, tag titles" model for the WWE has been dead for a long time. There isn't going to be any great consolidation of titles because they have the man power to warrant keeping them. |
![]() |
![]() |