Mania 26 it for Taker?

[Fignuts]

Yeah, but all it would be is a shortcut to getting a guy over. They could get a wrestler just as over without breaking the streak, it would just take longer.

So the question becomes, is it worth breaking Undertaker's wrestlemania legacy, just to get a guy over, faster?

I say no.

[Mogadishu]

Originally Posted by Fignuts So the question becomes, is it worth breaking Undertaker's wrestlemania legacy, just to get a guy over, faster? I say no.

Agreed, but you could also build up a guy for half a year or so, and THEN have him go over Taker at Mania. Personally? I'd keep Taker's streak in-tact. Taker's loyalty towards the WWE all of these years should be rewarded some how.
The way I'd book Taker to end his career, would be similar to Foley's (i.e. 3 losses in a row to a certain individual).

In the final match, I'd do it in a similar way to Austin/Rock Wrestlemania 19....where Austin kicked out of The Rock's finisher twice, before being defeated on the 3rd consecutive finisher.