WWE letting us tell us what they think of their current product

[jerichoholicninja]

Originally Posted by The Show Off Though the idea of a Hell in a Cell match is great (I own the WWE's Hell in a Cell DVD) the concept only works when the match is "special." The trouble that WWE Hell in a Cell had was that the card featured 3 Hell in a Cell matches 2 of which didn't have the bad blood necessary to warrent a Hell in a Cell match (ie Legacy/DX and CM Punk/Undertaker) though I like the 6 competitors in the two other cell matches their matches could have been better executed in some other way. As for John Cena v. Randy Orton, though I am not a big fan on John Cena the feud warrents a Hell in a Cell match. However, since you are now putting the two of them in an Iron Man match it makes the Hell in a Cell match less special. Hell in a Cell has always been and should always be the end all be all, and having a re-match after it makes the PPV less special. You'd be best served to take the less is more approach as far as Hell in a Cell or other specialty matches (ie Ladder, TLC, Submission). And focus on a variety of competitors rather than having Cena and Orton wrestle one another 4 PPV's in a row.

That is almost exactly what I wrote.