[QUOTE=KillerWolf;2786845]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reavant
so, is it really naive of me just to consider the possibility that three experts who came up with such a flagrant, outrageous judgement may have been acting on behalf of someone's interest? possibly even their own? is it not possible?
when i said "money riding on Machida" i meant in a 4 to 1 favorite, gambling sense - not a time and investment sense.
|
YES! Yes it is naive on your part to think that because that would involve many different people to agree on it and that means it would be easier to proove foul play because the more people that are involved, the easier it is to get information. And I knew what you meant on the 4-1 on machida, but I guess you forgot that rigging a fight which has implications on that 4-1 betting lines IS A FEDERAL CRIME! and if theres ever any indication of foul play it will be investigated like a terrorist threat and they will be caught.