Vince McMahon on TNA: "I don’t think that’s what the culture wants these days"

**Jeritron** · 03-26-2010, 04:16 PM

Friday Night Smackdown has more wrestling than Impact, by far. This is a fact, not an opinion.
Also, NXT has more wrestling in an hour than Impact ever does in 2.

As for Raw, they feature about an equal amount of in ring action. Usually Raw has a bit more.

Those are the facts. As for my opinion of the product, the non-wrestling aspect that both companies feature is much more coherent and tolerable in WWE. Storylines, fueds, booking, and the overall meaning behind everything is more clear-cut and logical in the WWE. Production value hasn't even entered the conversation yet, but I won't go there. That's just my view though, and you don't have to agree.

But claiming that TNA is heavier on wrestling than WWE would be false. So your point that it's like comparing saturday night live to a football match only holds relevance if Saturday Night Live contains more football than the football match.

03-26-2010, 04:16 PM	#11
Jeritron Get a poke on Posts: 35,234	Friday Night Smackdown has more wrestling than Impact, by far. This is a fact, not an opinion. Also, NXT has more wrestling in an hour than Impact ever does in 2. As for Raw, they feature about an equal amount of in ring action. Usually Raw has a bit more. Those are the facts. As for my opinion of the product, the non-wrestling aspect that both companies feature is much more coherent and tolerable in WWE. Storylines, fueds, booking, and the overall meaning behind everything is more clear-cut and logical in the WWE. Production value hasn't even entered the conversation yet, but I won't go there. That's just my view though, and you don't have to agree. But claiming that TNA is heavier on wrestling than WWE would be false. So your point that it's like comparing saturday night live to a football match only holds relevance if Saturday Night Live contains more football than the football match.