![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I watch Smackdown every week. Even still, how many times has Striker just made up names for people?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Posts: 61,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Personally, I feel that Shad Gaspard has got what he needs to be a complete package in the WWE. He's got charisma, he's got an imposing physique, a legitimate background and he can talk when he needs to (although he shouldn't do it all the time). This "my time" gimmick isn't really working, though. I think a lot of it has to do with the sort of booking they do on SmackDown! where everyone sort of looks good. The matches are more competitve, etc. so that the loser also looks good. The most I've enjoyed Shad recently was when he destroyed that jobber (a guy Striker actually talked up and gave a middle name to). I'd take a slow-burn approach with Gaspard. He needs a better theme (and apparently he has been using one at house shows), and he needs to walk over guys in squash matches for weeks and weeks. Have him keep count of the guys he destroys. We haven't really had a proper "Goldberg streak" in a while. Eventually, have a face call him out on not actually beating Superstars, which prompts Gaspard to destroy them. From there, you can move him up. For some reason, I really want to see a program between him and The Undertaker -- and I am not the biggest Taker fan. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |