Red Dead Redemption

**El Capitano Gatisto** · 05-27-2010, 08:25 PM

Funnily enough because I think Vice City had the best setting (the 80s) and also because it basically played out as a linear game. San Andreas brought in these shitty RPG elements that were a total chore. I still enjoyed San Andreas but the training/eating/girlfriend stuff did absolutely nothing for me. Having to earn different levels in guns and stuff too. It felt tacked on, like it was trying to be an RPG but GTA was fun, going back to the first game, for its total lack of morals and chaos. It still had the authentic feel and the humour (as RDR does, presentation is unquestionable, the soundtrack, voice acting, script etc. etc. is all perfect) but it was when they put things in that felt more like drudgery than playing a game.

05-27-2010, 08:25 PM	#11
El Capitano Gatisto World Class Raconteur Posts: 29,478	Funnily enough because I think Vice City had the best setting (the 80s) and also because it basically played out as a linear game. San Andreas brought in these shitty RPG elements that were a total chore. I still enjoyed San Andreas but the training/eating/girlfriend stuff did absolutely nothing for me. Having to earn different levels in guns and stuff too. It felt tacked on, like it was trying to be an RPG but GTA was fun, going back to the first game, for its total lack of morals and chaos. It still had the authentic feel and the humour (as RDR does, presentation is unquestionable, the soundtrack, voice acting, script etc. etc. is all perfect) but it was when they put things in that felt more like drudgery than playing a game.