![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is there any money in working the smarks on WWE's level?
Obviously working the smarks is huge to the indy scene, but should WWE ever bother working/pandering to the smarks/IWC? Does it do them any good?
Why should they ever work us? Are we a big enough group to make a difference? Discuss. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
You know that’s right
Posts: 52,766
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If you mean working a story around a smark inside joke then probably not. But if you mean pushing guys and angles that pique the smark's interest then absolutely. I mean why wouldn't you?
I mean chances are no matter what you do, your regular crowd will come along for the ride if you do it right. But often you lose the smarks because they're a bunch of whiny nitpicky cunts and they're hard to please. But if you do something the smarks will get interested in, you'll have them captivated and you'll have the regular crowd interested too. This might not be what you're getting at. I feel it isn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Smarks are pretty much guaranteed money. No point in really "working the smarks."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Da Gif/Pic Pimp
Posts: 13,913
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: 1,094
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This question has already been answered. WWE don't pander to smarks/IWC because they're (we're) the minority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
1/2 Optimist 1/2 Amazing
Posts: 12,427
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thing is, I'm a smark. But because I've grown up from what I was, I don't/can't watch wrestling as much, as it's not really must see TV like it used to be, for me. So most of the info I get is from the net.
However, seeing things like the NXT thing, really make me want to watch it, because they are doing something different, which draws me in. It's not about pandering to the smarks, it's about doing something outside of the bubble that makes me pay attention again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Still, we're a pretty small minority.
Guys who get drunk or high and then watch Cena change someone's attitude are where the money is. Oh, and kids too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
1/2 Optimist 1/2 Amazing
Posts: 12,427
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
And also in certain markets, like the UK, New York, Chicago and Montreal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They should..... because smarks are the onew who will actually pay $200 for an actual boxset of DVD's..... but until the kids stop buying $20 Cena t-shirts, I don't see it happening
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Makes perfect sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
WCW had a few storylines/feuds that were only understood by smarks but they were mostly because of backstage issues while the general audience had no clue what was going on or why the feud/storyline was even occurring.
Russo "firing" Hogan during the Bash at the beach ppv and Jericho's "feud" with Goldberg were a couple I could remember. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Just Some Guy
Posts: 14,679
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They should, but in a different way. ECW should have been in this form, with a show that does pander to the smarks and serves there interest, while RAW and Smackdown remain kids shows.
I still do not understand why WWE had three brands yet used them to only serve one section of the wrestling market. Not every wrestling fan wants to see the same thing, and the WWE is big enough to cater to all their interests with different shows. This would bring more fans in and obviously therefore make financial sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
You know, the most probable outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Just Some Guy
Posts: 14,679
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Just appeal to a different one on the third. Lets face it, did many people only watch NXT or ECW? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And the ratings were comparably poor. Might be an indicator. In fact, ECW went less smarky after it couldn't sustain ratings. But hey, I'm sure ECW was retired because it did so well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Also, ECW ran into a lot of early problems, with Kurt Angle leaving very shortly after originally being drafted over, and RVD being busted with drugs. I'm sure the original plan for ECW was to build towards RVD vs. Kurt Angle over the title, and that would have been awesome. But yeah, we never got that. We got Vince McMahon sticking his nose in and trying to push Bobby Lashley down our throats way too early. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Thank god I'm an Asshole!
Posts: 469
![]()
|
One of the few positive things that came out of the new ECW, was Heyman making Big Show look like a legit monster again. ECW Big Show with Heyman at his side was by far the best heel Big Show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Heyman always booked Show as a heel. It was cool seeing him do the cobra clutch backbreaker and such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Excuses are fun, but they're usually just that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,453
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
in all fairness, losing 3 main event talents doesn't help... but you know, we wouldn't want to get in the way of you being a sarcastic prick for no reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Look, I expect folks like Noid to retcon their outlooks on ECW now that it's failed and they're trying to distance themselves from it, but if you're going to ignore that, then you're really only posting to bitch about me, aren't you? Or did you ignore that context in your haste to be a sarcastic prick by calling me a sarcastic prick? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They should find a way to do both.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 88
![]() ![]()
|
There's money in working smarks on the ragsheets...that's for fuckin sure
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They offer the DVDs. They're obviously doing both. They're just not doing it in the ratios you want, and there's no real money in doing so.
Smarks can't compete in terms of profitability with kids. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it so, nor does the state of things change because you don't like it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I also didn't "blame" the Benoit incident, I just merely pointed it out as a definitive moment in ECW's history, and it was. That is the moment they stopped considering the ECW Title a "World Title." And just look at the rest of the ECW Title history after that point. Johnny Nitro, CM Punk (his first title win at that point), Chavo Guerrero, Kane (the most credible of the lot), Mark Henry, Matt Hardy, Jack Swagger (also his first title win), Christian, Tommy Dreamer, Christian and Ezekiel Jackson. Prior to the Benoit incident, you had Rob Van Dam, Big Show, Bobby Lashley, Vince McMahon (not a wrestler's wrestler, but he doesn't hold a title unless it is to get it attention) and Bobby Lashley again. The only guy there that had not been a World Champion before was Lashley, but he was considered as the third Superman of that time. I've mentioned that I feel the Benoit incident really damaged ECW as a project in the WWE's eyes for ages, so there is no "retcon" there. I am also not distancing myself from ECW -- I quite enjoyed the ECW product right up until the end. You make it sound like I have some sort of financial investment in ECW. It didn't work, but to say it failed because it was "smarky" is a bit ridiculous. NXT is smarkier than WWECW was. I believe ECW failed because it was made to be the third rung, and their title was often made to look like the equivalent to a mid-card belt, rather than a proper World Title. If the WWE marketed ECW as the bronze medal brand, how were people meant to take it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|