![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
PG has worsened the product in that the writers had a knack for writing really good edgy programming. When it comes to PG, they are pretty attrocious. (See R DX vs. PG DX. Just one example.)
PG is obviously not to the writers strength. However, you CAN put out an amazing product under a PG rating so I guess I'd blame the writing more than the PG restriction. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Next paragraph, you say that we can blame the writing more than the PG, which is more correct. WWE started hiring hollywood writers a few years back, moving away from guys with wrestling knowledge and experience, and so that's a major change that would impact the writing more than any restriction on content. I can't prove it, but I'm fairly well grounded when I say I bet they'd write just as bad if they were allowed to write TV MA or similar. |
|
![]() |
![]() |