WWE has just as many flaws as TNA...

**SaskatchewanChamp** · 07-20-2010, 01:14 AM

O.K. here is my take in a nutshell. The way I see it, TNA is not the competition, it is simply an alternative. It really reminds me of when people compare Wrestling vs. MMA. You cannot compare the two, you simply CANNOT. It is the same with TNA vs. WWE. All be it they are "wrestling shows," however Vince doesn't consider his product to be "wrestling" but entertainment instead. The production value, the corporate muscle, ect.. behind the WWE is far greater than that of TNA.

With that being said, TNA is headed in a different direction, trying to distinguish themselves as something other than just wrestling. I personally don't like it, but who knows, maybe they can do a good job at it. Only time will tell for sure.

07-20-2010, 01:14 AM	#16
SaskatchewanChamp The Champ Posts: 700	O.K. here is my take in a nutshell. The way I see it, TNA is not the competition, it is simply an alternative. It really reminds me of when people compare Wrestling vs. MMA. You cannot compare the two, you simply CANNOT. It is the same with TNA vs. WWE. All be it they are "wrestling shows," however Vince doesn't consider his product to be "wrestling" but entertainment instead. The production value, the corporate muscle, ect.. behind the WWE is far greater than that of TNA. With that being said, TNA is headed in a different direction, trying to distinguish themselves as something other than just wrestling. I personally don't like it, but who knows, maybe they can do a good job at it. Only time will tell for sure.