Since Linda McMahon lost and John Cena is turning heel, is PG over?

**TheAdamEvansFan** · 11-07-2010, 05:54 PM

WWE went PG way before returning to USA. They were PG oriented on TNN, but didn't have Cena as a main product.

As a Poli Sci Major, I love those idiot trolls who say Linda McMahon didnt turn WWE because of her political ambitions. GET REAL TRAILER TRASH.

It's obvious the McMahons have a dominant agenda acros s the board.
- Vince unsuccessfully to launch XFL.
- Linda unsuccessfully to Senate.
- Shane focusing on becoming a main player in other dominant and important companies.
- Steph & Triple H slowly taking the reigns.

It's been in the works for a decade now.

Cena will turn HEEL and he will have a mixed review like Triple H has managed. Kids might get their parents to purchase merchandise of Cena's, but if the adults are tired of seeing Cena and his predictible storylines, then they will stop purchasing PPVs.

It appears as if WCW was focused on the children in the 90s and WWF was focused on Attitude Era loving teens and young adults.

However, today, it appears TNA and WWE (ironically both companies with new names but same staffing) have switched audience bases. TNA appeals to teens and young adults (even bringing in middle aged adults due to the oldschool wrestlers) while WWE focuses on WWECares and other children type promotions for the children base. Oddly though, their pro youth push of advertising and promos was around Election Time to sell to the people that they are pro family.

I expect that to change as Vince will want to make a statement and not be swayed to stay the PG course after Linda was rejected her seat.

He will go back to what he knows, being controversial and edgy, not watered down and censored.

View Poll Results: A New Attitude Era: a Possibility or NOT. Good or Bad?
Yes, and it's a good idea	19	57.58%
No, and it's a bad idea.	11	33.33%
I don't care, I watch TNA.	8	24.24%
WWE needs ADAM EVANS to enable a NEW ATTITUDE ERA.	7	21.21%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 33. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

11-07-2010, 05:54 PM	#38
TheAdamEvansFan Adam Evans = Tough Enough Posts: 974	WWE went PG way before returning to USA. They were PG oriented on TNN, but didn't have Cena as a main product. As a Poli Sci Major, I love those idiot trolls who say Linda McMahon didnt turn WWE because of her political ambitions. GET REAL TRAILER TRASH. It's obvious the McMahons have a dominant agenda acros s the board. - Vince unsuccessfully to launch XFL. - Linda unsuccessfully to Senate. - Shane focusing on becoming a main player in other dominant and important companies. - Steph & Triple H slowly taking the reigns. It's been in the works for a decade now. Cena will turn HEEL and he will have a mixed review like Triple H has managed. Kids might get their parents to purchase merchandise of Cena's, but if the adults are tired of seeing Cena and his predictible storylines, then they will stop purchasing PPVs. It appears as if WCW was focused on the children in the 90s and WWF was focused on Attitude Era loving teens and young adults. However, today, it appears TNA and WWE (ironically both companies with new names but same staffing) have switched audience bases. TNA appeals to teens and young adults (even bringing in middle aged adults due to the oldschool wrestlers) while WWE focuses on WWECares and other children type promotions for the children base. Oddly though, their pro youth push of advertising and promos was around Election Time to sell to the people that they are pro family. I expect that to change as Vince will want to make a statement and not be swayed to stay the PG course after Linda was rejected her seat. He will go back to what he knows, being controversial and edgy, not watered down and censored.