![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If he's getting Danielson at Mania, it's all good, but there was a pretty clear drop off of when they made the decision to do Taker/Triple H instead of Sheamus/Triple H, which was CLEARLY the way they were going up until a month or two ago. Sheamus was namedropping Hunter every now and then, they had the ready-made feud to come back to and everything.
But there was definitely a point where Sheamus started to get buried. Not BADLY, but he started losing matches he had no business losing, and it felt like the Sheamus/Morrison feud was going no where. The problem with Sheamus losing to Mark Henry isn't the fact that he lost to Mark Henry, but the fact that, for years now, Henry has been a midcard joke at best. He was just floating around, losing matches and stuck in the tag division for a while. Then he suddenly starts to get the upper hand on Sheamus two weeks in a row. If Henry had been booked strong for the past, say, month, I could buy it. But not with this, especially because I honestly don't see this as a push for Henry. If it was, it'd be okay, but it's going to lead no where and bump Sheamus down the ladder even more, in a time where they need top stars. |
|
|
|