TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum
Reload this Page WWE needs a face faction
Register Members List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2011, 07:06 AM   #1
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,520
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKin3D View Post
Not a hugely successful stable, but could you say LWO started face? The story was Bischoff refused to push the Latino wrestlers and they felt they deserved the push.
To be fair, with the WWE doing so well in Mexican markets, I kind of thought to myself the other day that the WWE could bring back the lWo. Should I be ashamed? Chavo Guerrero can be the leader, and you can maybe have Primo defect from RAW to join the group. Stick Los Aviadores from FCW with them, and you've got yourself a fun, but when grouped together sorta dangerous faction.

But many others have hit the nail on the head -- a bunch of faces working together makes them look weak individually. They can work, but it'd usually be out of a necessity to battle a larger foe. For example -- if a group formed to destroy Nexus or The Corre, it could be quite good.

Also, Lara Emily's points were spot-on in this thread. Do not know what CSL was spazzing on about. He's usually right on point, too.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 07:33 AM   #2
Tom Guycott
Wrestling Marks Rejoice!
 
Tom Guycott's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,166
Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Not such a good idea, if only for the fact that WWE would find a way to make them the Mexicools all over again.
Tom Guycott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 10:00 AM   #3
CSL
Over Like Rover
 
CSL's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,444
CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lara Emily View Post
Dude you're the one who misinterpreted what I meant by big break. I didn't explain myself I reiterated myself in response to our stupid assumption that some how big break = debut, I purposely stated big break because I knew guys such as the Rock actually debuted as faces.You're the only one who read it as debut.
That is a big break to me. Showing up on WWE TV is the very definition of a big break. It was quite obviously short-sighted to assume everybody else thinks the same way and by the responses it seems they do but I just read your comment and responded, I don't tend to put much more thought into posting than that. Call it different perspectives or something. But stupid assumption? Child please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
To be fair, with the WWE doing so well in Mexican markets, I kind of thought to myself the other day that the WWE could bring back the lWo. Should I be ashamed? Chavo Guerrero can be the leader, and you can maybe have Primo defect from RAW to join the group. Stick Los Aviadores from FCW with them, and you've got yourself a fun, but when grouped together sorta dangerous faction.

But many others have hit the nail on the head -- a bunch of faces working together makes them look weak individually. They can work, but it'd usually be out of a necessity to battle a larger foe. For example -- if a group formed to destroy Nexus or The Corre, it could be quite good.

Also, Lara Emily's points were spot-on in this thread. Do not know what CSL was spazzing on about. He's usually right on point, too.
Show me where I'm doing anything but simply responding here. So many people's first reaction to disagreement on here is to jump to the 'taking it seriously'/getting angry line. Quite clearly no 'spazzing on' here Outback Jack.

Now can we get back 'on topic' or talk about Maryse's tatars or something?
CSL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 03:09 PM   #4
Lara Emily
Hey
 
Lara Emily's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,662
Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSL View Post
That is a big break to me. Showing up on WWE TV is the very definition of a big break. It was quite obviously short-sighted to assume everybody else thinks the same way and by the responses it seems they do but I just read your comment and responded, I don't tend to put much more thought into posting than that. Call it different perspectives or something. But stupid assumption? Child please.



Show me where I'm doing anything but simply responding here. So many people's first reaction to disagreement on here is to jump to the 'taking it seriously'/getting angry line. Quite clearly no 'spazzing on' here Outback Jack.

Now can we get back 'on topic' or talk about Maryse's tatars or something?

You kept stating over an over that I didn't have a point, even though every one else in the thread knew what I was talking about (even if they didn't agree) then when I reiterated my point (not expanded, reiterated) for your benefit you claimed that as proof that I wasn't being clear earlier, again even though everyone else understood what I was saying. It's not a different a opinion, a different opinion would be I disagree with what you said here's why not you aren't saying anything, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Instead of invalidating my position based on your own misreading of my words, you could have asked for a clarification. Instead you cried that I didn't know what I was talking about and that I wasn't making a point, so sorry that's not a different perspective that's making a stupid assumption end of story.

Oh and saying whatever man I don't really think before I post, not exactly a winning argument either.

Have a nice day
Lara Emily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 04:32 PM   #5
CSL
Over Like Rover
 
CSL's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,444
CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lara Emily View Post
You kept stating over an over that I didn't have a point, even though every one else in the thread knew what I was talking about (even if they didn't agree) then when I reiterated my point (not expanded, reiterated) for your benefit you claimed that as proof that I wasn't being clear earlier, again even though everyone else understood what I was saying. It's not a different a opinion, a different opinion would be I disagree with what you said here's why not you aren't saying anything, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Instead of invalidating my position based on your own misreading of my words, you could have asked for a clarification. Instead you cried that I didn't know what I was talking about and that I wasn't making a point, so sorry that's not a different perspective that's making a stupid assumption end of story.

Oh and saying whatever man I don't really think before I post, not exactly a winning argument either.

Have a nice day
lol 'Have a nice day ' The smugness of that is practically dripping on to my keyboard you utter tragedy.

I was going to respond to this properly but no matter how I respond, this is going to go on and on because you seem to think there's something going on other than what I'm actually saying to you, that I'm somehow trying to save face or something, that we're embroiled in some kind of war of words where only one person can win, that I wasn't really just not thinking anything into it and responding 'off the cuff' (brilliant observation btw, couldn't have at all been possible that I was talking about in this singular instance, this one thread I happened to be participating in whilst attempting to do about 8 other things where it became quite blindingly obvious I'd missed some kind of point for some kind of reason) If you actually believe that this is the case (which it seems to be by your ridiculously smug posting and your incessant need to try and prove that you are somehow right to keep banging on) please get the fuck over yourself. This thread has now been tedious (not the TPWW.net/forums poster) for almost as long as you have. I am done here.
CSL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 04:53 PM   #6
Lara Emily
Hey
 
Lara Emily's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,662
Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Lara Emily puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSL View Post
lol 'Have a nice day ' The smugness of that is practically dripping on to my keyboard you utter tragedy.

I was going to respond to this properly but no matter how I respond, this is going to go on and on because you seem to think there's something going on other than what I'm actually saying to you, that I'm somehow trying to save face or something, that we're embroiled in some kind of war of words where only one person can win, that I wasn't really just not thinking anything into it and responding 'off the cuff' (brilliant observation btw, couldn't have at all been possible that I was talking about in this singular instance, this one thread I happened to be participating in whilst attempting to do about 8 other things where it became quite blindingly obvious I'd missed some kind of point for some kind of reason) If you actually believe that this is the case (which it seems to be by your ridiculously smug posting and your incessant need to try and prove that you are somehow right to keep banging on) please get the fuck over yourself. This thread has now been tedious (not the TPWW.net/forums poster) for almost as long as you have. I am done here.
Let's just summarize.

1. I make an observation, a point if you will
2. Instead of discussing what I said. You claim several times over that I was made no point and that I clearly had no idea what I was trying to say. All that despite everyone else getting what I was saying (even if they don't agree)
3. I reiterate my point, restating pretty much exactly what I said earlier, for your benefit
4. You use my restatement as evidence that I initially had no point
5. I show you that both statements are consistent with each other
6. You say well I wasn't really putting thought in to my posts
7. QED
Lara Emily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 04:59 PM   #7
CSL
Over Like Rover
 
CSL's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,444
CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)CSL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSL View Post
I was going to respond to this properly but no matter how I respond, this is going to go on and on because you seem to think there's something going on other than what I'm actually saying to you, that I'm somehow trying to save face or something, that we're embroiled in some kind of war of words where only one person can win, that I wasn't really just not thinking anything into it and responding 'off the cuff' (brilliant observation btw, couldn't have at all been possible that I was talking about in this singular instance, this one thread I happened to be participating in whilst attempting to do about 8 other things where it became quite blindingly obvious I'd missed some kind of point for some kind of reason)
Re-usable posts are a thing of the future.
CSL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Forums Home - TPWW - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®