![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Either way, I can't see how anything he did in 2002 was more relevant than his ECW title run, Jerishow, his feuds with Cena and Taker, or the major Wrestlemania angle with Flloyd Mayweather. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Hey
Posts: 15,662
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Jerishow was a tag team, he also was part of Showmiz we totally know how important tag teams are in the grand scheme of things, his ECW title reign was the start of the downfall of ECWE that culminated at Decemberto Dismember, Floyd Mayweather angle was awesome (mostly because of Floyd Mayweather) but was exactly 2 months and was a glorified sideshow rather then say a legit wrestling thing and to boot he lost (which was fantastic). I don't even remember his feud with Taker TBH Any of his Main Event angles have all been to essentially give the champ a legit threat (based on size) so that when they beat Show they supposedly look awesome. Hence Jobber to the Stars |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
His place on the card and the hierarchy of the WWE is what it is. Again, it's something that really isn't for you and me to decide. He's irrelevant and dismissed as a "jobber" to the stars, why? Because he never comes out as THE top guy of the promotion. Do you consider Jericho to be an irrelevant jobber to the stars, and when he wins it's innappropriate? How about CM Punk? Once again, I'm afraid you are letting your personal taste get in the way of reality. |
|
![]() |
![]() |