TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2011, 12:15 AM   #1
Mr. C
Ghost town
 
Mr. C's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,192
Mr. C is "reptacular" (2,500+)Mr. C is "reptacular" (2,500+)Mr. C is "reptacular" (2,500+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Next Big Thing
That's all fine and good in fantasy, reality is if Brock Lesnar beats Alistair Overeem in December he won't be going to the Royal Rumble to hype a Wrestlemania match with the Undertaker. Hell, Lesnar's next fight might even be the same month as Wrestlemania.

Again, the idea works for wrestling fans and the WWE, but for Dana White and the UFC it does nothing. The only way Brock goes back to wrestle for the WWE is if he retires from MMA or loses badly to Overeem and gets cut.
Agree 100%. That fight is a #1 contender's bout for the Heavyweight title. If Lesnar wins, he's likely re-signing so he can fight Velasquez/Dos Santos for the title. However, if he loses, most likely he'll leave the UFC for WrestleMania.


Quote:
I think that's the other thing. Dana may know it's fake, but I think he'd still have a problem with his biggest star in "for real" fighting losing to a 50 year old man in "fake fighting." The headlines in the MMA world and on sites like ESPN would be a joke after that.
Didn't stop him from signing him the first time. I mean, the guy was 1-0 and widely known at the time as "the wrestler." What did Dana do next? Put him in the main event of a pay-per-view with Frank Mir. As far as losing in a WWE ring, everyone knows that a loss to Undertaker is scripted and wouldn't hurt Lesnar. Again, wrestling for two years didn't hurt him.
Mr. C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 02:06 PM   #2
Next Big Thing
 
Next Big Thing's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,839
Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Next Big Thing has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. C View Post
Didn't stop him from signing him the first time. I mean, the guy was 1-0 and widely known at the time as "the wrestler." What did Dana do next? Put him in the main event of a pay-per-view with Frank Mir. As far as losing in a WWE ring, everyone knows that a loss to Undertaker is scripted and wouldn't hurt Lesnar. Again, wrestling for two years didn't hurt him.
Wasn't the main event, but that's just minor.

Also, Brock Lesnar wasn't signed solely because he was a former WWE wrestler. He was signed because he was a dominant NCAA wrestling champion and wrestling is arguably the best base to have when transitioning into MMA. He'd also gained some credibility as a "real athlete" from his tryout for the Vikings. Hell, it had been 3 years since he wrestled for the WWE after only spending 2 years at the forefront. If being a former WWE champion or having some kind of status as a wrestling great was all it took or had such great appeal, Lashley and Batista would be in the UFC. Jim Ross was pretty much begging for a job doing UFC commentary and got ignored.

The main stream media that covers MMA views pro wrestling as a joke. ESPN and other sports publications didn't give a damn about Brock Lesnar until he moved away from pro wrestling and tried out for the Vikings/joined the UFC. Dana doesn't want his guys getting mixed up with that.

More than anything else, it's about perception. Go find the thread with the idiots who got a hard on after the Lesnar/Undertaker "confrontation" and said dumb shit like "Brock is scared of Taker" or that "Taker would beat Brock up in real life." The fact that those people were too stupid or too big of marks to understand why Brock wouldn't respond to Taker after getting his brain scrambled and losing his title or that a 6'4 NCAA wrestler with adequate boxing and jiu jitsu training would probably put an injury riddled 46 year old pro wrestler in a coma shows that some people aren't capable of distinguishing between Brock losing in the UFC and Brock losing in the WWE. If the UFC builds Brock up as the "Baddest Man on the Planet" why would they want him to go to the WWE and get beaten by the Undertaker?

When you have the Rock and Undertaker saying shit like if they could go back and do it all over again they would have done MMA, they're saying that stuff in reaction to the perception that MMA fighters are tougher/more bad ass than professional wrestlers and want to be perceived as a part of that mold. Why do you think the Undertaker adopted a jiu jitsu submission technique? Why do you think they talk up Daniel Bryan training in MMA? You don't think the WWE would try to use something like Brock losing as a way to hype their guys up again? Especially when there is some resentment towards MMA by some guys like HHH and Jericho again due to the perception that pro wrestling is inferior. It's not worth the headache to Dana.
Next Big Thing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®