![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Posts: 61,524
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It wouldn't hurt the WWE to reduce the number of PPV, lower the prices of them and present original matches at each other; but ultimately it comes down to people not having the disposable income to spend on professional wrestling or mixed martial arts.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Selective dismissal does not invalidate the point, nor does it validate the notion that the problem is the number of PPVs WWE has. The number of PPVs WWE has had has been rather stable for a while, and does not correlate to declines. There have been declines with so many PPVs, and there have been notably non-declining periods with the same. Clearly, there is another factor involved. As the number of PPVs does not seem to impact buyrates consistently. |
||
![]() |
![]() |