![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ghost town
Posts: 1,192
![]() ![]() ![]() |
After having The Undertaker appear on RAW right before Mark Henry was removed from the Elimination Chamber, did it ever cross anybody's mind in the WWE to replace Henry with Undertaker? Why wouldn't WWE have him in it over The Great Khali? Makes no sense. They could've easily had him, just one time, wrestle before defending his streak. Stupid writing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
BAY BAY
Posts: 36,524
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
"Hey guys, been out for a year after HHH tried to basically kill me. After a year of waiting for a return, let's blow it at Elimination Chamber where I can look close to winning the title and then job. Great plan!" EDIT: Obviously "absolute worst" is hyperbole. They could always have put Clox in it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Ghost town
Posts: 1,192
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Undertaker shows up looking for a rematch with Triple-H, who doesn't accept, so with the match seemingly not happening, Long decides to replace Henry with Undertaker. Match comes down to Undertaker and whoever wins, Triple-H interferes and Pedigrees Undertaker, who gets pinned. Rematch set. |
|
![]() |
![]() |