![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
love yourself
Posts: 47,788
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I dunno. I feel like arguements could be made for the Dolphins, Chiefs, Cardinals, Broncos, Texans (if they are pursuing or w/e), and even the gay ass Jets could be considered. Can't see him going to the Redskins, think I am pretty safe in ruling them out.
If I took everything i know/think about Peyton and pretended to be him this is the order of appeal I think he would have Texans Chiefs/Broncos (idk) Cardinals Dolphins Jets |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Posts: 52,478
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Jets dont stand a chance just on principle of both Mannings playing in NY. The idea of Peyton Manning playing for the Cardinals is ridiculous, but they're in a decently winnable division with most of the parts in place. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
Posts: 23,622
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The only teams that "don't need QBs" are those that already have top tier QBs (GB, NO, NE, NYG - probably forgetting some). Other teams should be doing all they can to get Peyton, especially if they're on the list of teams for which he'd consider playing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Posts: 52,478
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would have considered Schaub at the top of the 2nd tier of QBs under that top tier, how quickly people forget him after the Texans had to deal with TJ Yates for 1/2 a season. You bring in Manning and you risk them struggling with a new QB vs being the favorite in the AFC next year with a healthy Schaub, Mario Williams and Andre Johnson in that piss poor division..
|
![]() |