NFL 2012 Off-Season Thread

**FearedSanctity** · 04-19-2012, 08:58 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._by_population

According to this, the only cities in the top 32 that don't have a team or one in the immediate area are: San Antonio(#7)/Austin(#14), Columbus(#15), El Paso(#19), Memphis(#20), Louisville(#27), Milwaukee(#28), Portland(#29), Las Vegas(#30), Oklahoma City(#31) and Albuquerque(#32)

Gotta think Memphis, Columbus and Milwaukee aren't really options due to well established in state teams. And El Paso basically just sucks. Really only leaves San Antonio/Austin, Louisville, Portland, Vegas, Oklahoma City and Albuquerque as the most viable in terms of population. Though I don't really see anyone racing to set up in Kentucky, New Mexico or Oklahoma

04-19-2012, 08:58 PM	#11
FearedSanctity Von Killer Posts: 4,471	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._by_population According to this, the only cities in the top 32 that don't have a team or one in the immediate area are: San Antonio(#7)/Austin(#14), Columbus(#15), El Paso(#19), Memphis(#20), Louisville(#27), Milwaukee(#28), Portland(#29), Las Vegas(#30), Oklahoma City(#31) and Albuquerque(#32) Gotta think Memphis, Columbus and Milwaukee aren't really options due to well established in state teams. And El Paso basically just sucks. Really only leaves San Antonio/Austin, Louisville, Portland, Vegas, Oklahoma City and Albuquerque as the most viable in terms of population. Though I don't really see anyone racing to set up in Kentucky, New Mexico or Oklahoma