![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It depends on the character. I actually posted an idea involving Sandow losing to 'zeke last night in the Smackdown thread. I'm a huge Sandow fan but done right, it could have been great for his character.
If you're building guys as a serious contender/threat, then yes having them win constantly is important. Ryback should not lose a match for a long, long, long, LONG time. His first loss should be monumental. I'm sick of this whole thing WWE has done for years where everyone loses like half the matches they're in. It's ridiculous. Punk loses a ton, Cena loses a ton... at a certain point, who cares about wins or losses? The title's gonna go on whoever regardless of how much they win or lose. It may be my biggest problem with wrestling today. That's why I'm glad when they actually have someone like Ryback who they're putting in the slow build of making him look like a beast. It's a small step but dammit, some people need to look more dominant than others. The parity in wrestling needs to end. |
![]() |
![]() |