Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
Yes. I proved the point that you are unable to explain how the formula works in any way, shape or form so you evade like a motherfucker.
Seriously... I'm arguing the fact that the whole main eventer losing regularly as a way to build hype is pointless and only makes matches less relevant... and you can't see how bringing up a feud that was based in no way on matches has nothing to do with what I'm arguing.
I accept that you ACTUALLY believe the stupid shit you say about Riley and Slater... but you have to be trying to be this dumb now.
|
Are you seriously arguing that the guy who has been WWE Champion since November, has made everyone from Alberto Del Rio to Chris Jericho tap-out, and whose slogan is that he is "The Best in the World" is being made to look weaker than the opponents he dominates in his feuds? I am against champions losing non-title matches all the time, too, but Punk has seriously only lost via DQ (as part of a storyline), in tag team matches (in feuds he otherwise dominated) or in Handicap Matches, in which case the overwhelmed party should usually always win (unless we're talking Ryback squashes).
Punk's feud with Cena is
exactly my point, and you're backing it up constantly -- "feud that was based in no way on matches." Thank you again. For someone arguing that wins and losses are so critical, you haven't explained how it would even be possible for a feud to be based on anything other than matches.