Better Tag Team # 112

**Theo Dious** · 01-20-2013, 07:30 PM

Also, the Nasty Boys were never terrible, though I think the best that can be said is that they were a good team for their time. I'd definitely rather have seen them at any given time over the Steiners or LOD who just never did anything for me as teams. The Dudleys though, as much of a non-ECW mark as I am, are to tag team wrestling what Mick Foley is to singles wrestling.

**itsmeJD** · 01-20-2013, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tedious

Also, the Nasty Boys were never terrible, though I think the best that can be said is that they were a good team for their time. I'd definitely rather have seen them at any given time over the Steiners or LOD who just never did anything for me as teams. The Dudleys though, as much of a non-ECW mark as I am, are to tag team wrestling what Mick Foley is to singles wrestling.

I'll never be able to view you the same after reading you'd rather watch the god damn nasty boys over the Steiners and Road Warriors....

Jesus.. *shudders*

View Poll Results: Better Tag Team # 112
Dudley Boyz	41	91.11%
Nasty Boys	4	8.89%
Voters: 45. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

01-20-2013, 07:30 PM	#1
Theo Dious EATER OF HOT POCKETS Posts: 14,340	Also, the Nasty Boys were never terrible, though I think the best that can be said is that they were a good team for their time. I'd definitely rather have seen them at any given time over the Steiners or LOD who just never did anything for me as teams. The Dudleys though, as much of a non-ECW mark as I am, are to tag team wrestling what Mick Foley is to singles wrestling.