Raw Thread for 4-22-13: Can the Brothers of Destruction and D-Bry stop The Shield? Ambrose says, "NOPE!"

**Joesgonnakillyou** · 04-24-2013, 07:24 AM

WWE.com speculating about a 4th member of the shield means there is no 4th member of the shield.

They should keep doing what they're doing until tension rises between Ambrose and Reigns, with Rollins playing peacekeeper. Play that out for a while and then they can finally lose a match, Ambrose and Reigns argue after the match and Rollins seperates them and tries to calm them both down, they attack him, and Rollins turns face.

04-24-2013, 07:24 AM	#38
Joesgonnakillyou Posts: 1,094	WWE.com speculating about a 4th member of the shield means there is no 4th member of the shield. They should keep doing what they're doing until tension rises between Ambrose and Reigns, with Rollins playing peacekeeper. Play that out for a while and then they can finally lose a match, Ambrose and Reigns argue after the match and Rollins seperates them and tries to calm them both down, they attack him, and Rollins turns face.