Ending the streak.

**DaVe** · 08-05-2013, 07:34 AM

Can't agree with the logic that 'if you do not want to risk wasting the ending of a streak on someone you should not risk pushing anyone ever'... The streak is bigger than any other title at Wrestlemania each year; the match itself is single biggest of the year. While Undertaker is a guaranteed hall of famer regardless of the streak, the Streak is the Undertaker at this point and as others have said, there are many benefits of keeping the streak in tact monetarily and intangibly/sentimentally.
Thus the consequences of blowing the ending of the streak are many orders of magnitude greater than having a wrestler blow a push and the logic outlined above does not make sense to me: just because you're happy to blow $50 on a bet does not mean you are happy to blow $1,000,000 on the exact same bet.

For these reasons the only candidate I can see for ending the streak is John Cena.

08-05-2013, 07:34 AM	#27
DaVe yeah nah good mate Posts: 1,499	Can't agree with the logic that 'if you do not want to risk wasting the ending of a streak on someone you should not risk pushing anyone ever'... The streak is bigger than any other title at Wrestlemania each year; the match itself is single biggest of the year. While Undertaker is a guaranteed hall of famer regardless of the streak, the Streak is the Undertaker at this point and as others have said, there are many benefits of keeping the streak in tact monetarily and intangibly/sentimentally. Thus the consequences of blowing the ending of the streak are many orders of magnitude greater than having a wrestler blow a push and the logic outlined above does not make sense to me: just because you're happy to blow $50 on a bet does not mean you are happy to blow $1,000,000 on the exact same bet. For these reasons the only candidate I can see for ending the streak is John Cena.