State Your Case: Why do think TNA and WWE are good/bad?

**Vastardikai** · 01-04-2014, 06:08 PM

These are the vibes I get from Both Companies:

WWE: A solid company that, if they ever wanted/had to get serious, could be the greatest program with their current level of talent. There are maybe 3 people in TNA that are legit on par with the best of WWE's regulars. Then, they could drop someone far and above anyone at a moments notice. Main problem is, they can't/have no reason to get serious.

TNA: A decent company that, if they wanted to get everything going in the right direction, could actually be a decent contender to WWE. Main problem is, they are more of a tax write-off for Panda Energy and Spike as is, and make horrible mistakes that they cannot really afford to make at this stage of the game.

01-04-2014, 06:08 PM	#3
Vastardikai Taller than Adam Cole Posts: 10,876	These are the vibes I get from Both Companies: WWE: A solid company that, if they ever wanted/had to get serious, could be the greatest program with their current level of talent. There are maybe 3 people in TNA that are legit on par with the best of WWE's regulars. Then, they could drop someone far and above anyone at a moments notice. Main problem is, they can't/have no reason to get serious. TNA: A decent company that, if they wanted to get everything going in the right direction, could actually be a decent contender to WWE. Main problem is, they are more of a tax write-off for Panda Energy and Spike as is, and make horrible mistakes that they cannot really afford to make at this stage of the game.