Quote:
Originally Posted by DAMN iNATOR
Why? Other than watching the match itself, what proof is there to support this supposed MOUNTAIN of "evidence" that there's no way 'Taker could have won? I might sound crazy to some and I may well be in the minority here, but there's no way I'm convinced that he couldn't have hit the Tombstone or gotten Brock locked in to Hell's Gate and moved to 22-0.
|
I never said anything about "mountains of evidence"... the story of the match was simply that Undertaker is getting old and "past it", whilst Brock Lesnar is a fucking killing machine that will beat the shit out of anyone.
Stop being such a mark.