If not Roman Reigns, then who?

**mitch_h** · 12-30-2014, 08:19 PM

I feel like people are way too hard on Roman Reigns, I don't feel like he's completely bereft of charisma, and he's better in the ring than people say. Like a lot of guys on the roster he is the victim of bad booking, but in his case it's bad...good booking. Like they are pushing him ,but not giving him any interesting feuds or real reason to care about him, it's just like "here is this guy, you should like him because he's cool and he's winning". I don't think you can manufacture a "face of the company", you need the support of creative, but some of it has to be organic or whatever.

12-30-2014, 08:19 PM	#11
mitch_h Posts: 6,727	I feel like people are way too hard on Roman Reigns, I don't feel like he's completely bereft of charisma, and he's better in the ring than people say. Like a lot of guys on the roster he is the victim of bad booking, but in his case it's bad...good booking. Like they are pushing him ,but not giving him any interesting feuds or real reason to care about him, it's just like "here is this guy, you should like him because he's cool and he's winning". I don't think you can manufacture a "face of the company", you need the support of creative, but some of it has to be organic or whatever.