![]() |
|
View Poll Results: "To be a great babyface, you have to be a great heel" | |||
Agree |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 44.44% |
Disagree |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 55.56% |
Voters: 18. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#25 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You pretty much nailed it. I think the WWE's biggest problem from 2001-present day, is that they alter the character of the wrestler way too much whenever said successful heel transitions into a face. One thing that made Austin and Rocky TREMENDOUS, was the fact that even when they both turned face, they still maintained their heelish persona's for a significant time and the fans ate them up. Undertaker's character has withstood the test of time, largely due to the fact that his character/personality pretty much stays the same whether he's a heel or a face. He's a badass either way. The very worst thing that I ever saw as a WWE fan, was how the WWE handled Orton's premature face turn in 2004. Lesnar's premature face turn in 2002 is also one of the dumbest most ill-advised moves that I ever saw. |
|
![]() |
![]() |