Quote:
Originally Posted by road doggy dogg
Reigns was the right choice. Bryan is already an A-list wrassler, let's see them try and build someone else up to that level to have more viable feuds at the top of the ladder.
|
You're supposed to do that before the guy main events Wrestlemania, not after the fact. Thats my biggest problem with reigns winning. He has done NOTHING as a singles competitor. Thats why his rumble win and his placement in the mania main event have felt forced. He hasnt been built up properly, and has just been thrown into this position.
Some people say bryan wouldn't be believable. Which is a completely stupid arguement, but i wont get into that right now. But reigns beating lesnar is even more unbelievable to me. Bryan has been slowly over the past few years to be a top guy. He went from nxt rookie to beating the wwe's top stars and every victory was believable, because they built him up right. Because of all that, and because of bryan's sheer talent in the ring, i can believe him barely squeaking out a victory.
Reigns doesn't have that history. He has had no feuds to build him him up on any signifigant level. He's not believable as a main event competitor, let alone as the guy to beat one of the most fearsome champs in wwe history.
Maybe in time he can be, but right now, bryan makes more sense and is by far the better story.