The thread where we get CyNick to defend maligned storylines, and tell us how we don't understand...

[#1-norm-fan]

Either way, when you obviously avoid tons of shit that works too much against your narrative (usually within posts you're replying to or making direct references to later, so "I missed it" doesn't work) and your only response when called out on it is "No I don't. OTHER PEOPLE have no response." you're either trolling or you're not quite all there and you are unreasonable beyond repair. It's like standing in a field with a hundred people looking up and saying the sky is blue while one guy is like "No it isn't!". I mean... it's clear for everyone else to see but if you're gonna argue, it's probably hopeless to talk to you whether you're serious or not. Probably best to just let the obvious speak for itself while you close your eyes, plug your ears and convince yourself you're pwning everyone.

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan Either way, when you obviously avoid tons of shit that works too much against your narrative (usually within posts you're replying to or making direct references to later, so "I missed it" doesn't work) and your only response when called out on it is "No I don't. OTHER PEOPLE have no response." you're either trolling or you're not quite all there and you are unreasonable beyond repair. It's like standing in a field with a hundred people looking up and saying the sky is blue while one guy is like "No it isn't!". I mean... it's clear for everyone else to see but if you're gonna argue, it's probably hopeless to talk to you whether you're serious or not. Probably best to just let the obvious speak for itself while you close your eyes, plug your ears and convince yourself you're pwning everyone.

I like your notion that if I miss some obscure post of yours its either A. I'm ignoring these arguments that are devastating to my point or B. I'm not all there.

The idea that I could have just not found your post to be that relevant or just missed the post is too far out there a concept to give legitimacy to.

I think you have a narcissistic problem.

[#1-norm-fan]

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan Either way, when you obviously avoid tons of shit that works too much against your narrative (usually within posts you're replying to or making direct references to later, so "I missed it" doesn't work) and your only response when called out on it is "No I don't. OTHER PEOPLE have no response." you're either trolling or you're not quite all there and you are unreasonable beyond repair...

Originally Posted by The CyNick I like your notion that if I miss some obscure post of yours its either A. I'm ignoring these arguments that are devastating to my point or B. I'm not all there. The idea that I could have just not found your post to be that relevant or just missed the post is too far out there a concept to give legitimacy to.

... Yep.

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan ... Yep.

Ok cool

[The CyNick]

I'm also curious what my "narratives" are.

As best I can tell it would be:

1. Despite reduced ratings this year, WWE doesn't need to get overly concerned because the rest of cable has been doing worse and their digital properties are through the roof successful. - I have proven this point so many times, I'm sick of writing about it.

2. Dirt Sheet writers are low level hacks pretending to be journalists - at best this an opinion, but I feel like I've proven my point with recent stories

3. If you watch WWE just to complain, you are nutty to me - again an opinion, really kind of hard to argue with IMO. But if you do it, I can see how you would be offended

4. WWE creative has done a great job building up new stars like Daniel Bryan, The Shield, New Day, and Bray Wyatt - another thing that people argue unsuccessfully with me about.

5. I enjoy WWE - probably get the most hate about this one. Not really sure why.