Raw rating lowest since July 2012

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead I believe this line of argument has been answered ad nauseum. This is another logical fallacy (one of many which you like to use) and you are using it to distract from having to make any sense. Aka you're being a big wank

Its actually the one that cuts at the heart of the issue with you people.

I challenge you to notice something with these debates. The people on here who CLAIM to be against my position that WWE is for the most part really great have the most detailed knowledge of storylines. #1fan or whatever that gimmick is, is probably the worst offender. He'll try to use these obscure details of storylines to "prove" WWE is terrible at writing. I'll open myself up here, but I don't watch every hour of WWE TV. I barely get the chance to watch all of RAW. I rarely watch Smackdown in its entirety and I don't watch anything else.

But when I watch, 9 times out of 10 I say that was a good laugh and I let my fellow fans here know I enjoyed the show. The odd thing is the people who CLAIM to hate every aspect of the show, seem to watch in the most detail. So you're left with two options to explain this behaviour. Either they are lying, which I believe to be most likely, at the very least exaggerating their dislike of the show to align with the groupthink mentality of the IWC. Or they wish to punish themselves and watch something they don't enjoy week after week. I could see doing this for a month, maybe a year. But some people will reference terrible stuff from 15 years ago. Meaning they have been not enjoying the show longer than they enjoyed it. Weird behaviour if you ask me. I guess there is a third option, where people claim they hated the product, stopped watching, now just read about the product and then spend hours in their life posting in great detail about something they don't enjoy and don't watch and therefore can't formulate a worthwhile opinion on the product. Of course that would be utterly pathetic, so I don't think many fall into that category.

[Ol Dirty Dastard]

Originally Posted by The CyNick Its actually the one that cuts at the heart of the issue with you people. I challenge you to notice something with these debates. The people on here who CLAIM to be against my position that WWE is for the most part really great have the most detailed knowledge of storylines. #1fan or whatever that gimmick is, is probably the worst offender. He'll try to use these obscure details of storylines to "prove" WWE is terrible at writing. I'll open myself up here, but I don't watch every hour of WWE TV. I barely get the chance to watch all of RAW. I rarely watch Smackdown in its entirety and I don't watch anything else. But when I watch, 9 times out of 10 I say that was a good laugh and I let my fellow fans here know I enjoyed the show. The odd thing is the people who CLAIM to hate every aspect of the show, seem to watch in the most detail. So you're left with two options to explain this behaviour. Either they are lying, which I believe to be most likely, at the very least exaggerating their dislike of the show to align with the groupthink mentality of the IWC. Or they wish to punish themselves and watch something they don't enjoy week after week. I could see doing this for a month, maybe a year. But some people will reference terrible stuff from 15 years ago. Meaning they have been not enjoying the show longer than they enjoyed it. Weird behaviour if you ask me. I guess there is a third option, where people claim they hated the product, stopped watching, now just read about the product and then spend hours in their life posting in great detail about something they don't enjoy and don't watch and therefore can't formulate a worthwhile opinion on the product. Of course that would be utterly pathetic, so I don't think many fall into that category.

Being a big bombastic butthole will do you no favours.