![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Should Chris Jericho headline a HOF class or be a "B" level entry? | |||
Jericho should be the headliner |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 97.22% |
Jericho is more of a "B" name than a headliner |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.78% |
Jericho should not be inducted into the HOF |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Nia Jax |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 5.56% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 36. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#22 |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Headliner, without question.
Very few people in the wrestling industry have achieved more than Chris Jericho. During the attitude era, if Rock or Austin hadn't been there, and if Triple H hadn't had the political pull that he did, Jericho would have been THE guy. The WWE tried to give the 'ball' to a few other guys ranked higher on the proverbial totem pole than Jericho, but they all failed for various reasons: 1) Kurt Angle had drug problems and so the WWE couldn't really commit to him. 2) Randy Orton was an immature douche backstage 3) Brock Lesnar wasn't passionate about WWE and bailed 4) Chris Benoit wasn't charismatic enough 5) Triple H just wasn't "likeable" enough as a face. Looking back in retrospect, Jericho should have been the guy to take the torch from Rock/Austin in 2003, and then pass the torch to Cena in 2005. Jericho is 100% a headliner HOF candidate. |
![]() |
![]() |