Undertaker vs Roman---- the final verdict

[Destor]

Originally Posted by Damian Rey 2.0 Getting a reaction and getting the right reaction are two different things. If a guy goes out there and gets boring chants, it's a reaction. But it's the wrong one. Reigns is written, wrestles, talks and walks as a face. But he's received as a heel. To the point that it hijacks segments. That's not a positive. A reaction is better than no reaction, but is the complete opposite reaction than the one desired good? I think there's an argument there. It'd be different if they were organic with it all and made changes based on it. But they don't. They force feed and its apparent. As far as the match, I thought, given the circumstances, it was exceptional. It was paced very well, there was some great spots, and the back and forth of it until Taker's body gave was a great story. Yeah, there were botches. Flair botched and bridge in his last match and took a phantom bump. It happens. Doesn't ruin or take anything from the overall story. I thought Roman did well. He really is a main event level performer. I just feel like he's a natural, cocky douche bag and wish they'd just let him play that up. But it was nonetheless a very good main event and much better than last year.

If youbthink reigns is booked like a baby watch the rumble again