Quote:
Originally Posted by Destor
Debatable but lets give you that point.
Does WCWs exceptionally bad year out rank the lifespan of bad or meh from TNA when you account for the ABSOLUTELY GREAT that WCW did over the years?
|
WCW had a great 1 and a half years. Their highs were way higher than TNA, but their lows were way lower than TNA. With the amount of resources WCW had, there's no way they should have been that bad. Not by a mile. WCW 2000 was unwatchable. I can't say that about any year in TNA.