Should WWE have one set of tag titles?

[Damian Rey 2.0]

They don't have enough creative wherewithal to have one deep division. Right now the easy booking is have a team beat the champs in a non title match to build them up, then have the title match. It's an easy, albeit lazy way to keep the title picture going.

If they combine the division, they'll have too many teams they won't know what to do with and it'll make things worse, even though booking multiple feuds on 5 hours of television shouldn't be that hard, but we know they won't do that.

[Emperor Smeat]

Originally Posted by Damian Rey 2.0 They don't have enough creative wherewithal to have one deep division. Right now the easy booking is have a team beat the champs in a non title match to build them up, then have the title match. It's an easy, albeit lazy way to keep the title picture going. If they combine the division, they'll have too many teams they won't know what to do with and it'll make things worse, even though booking multiple feuds on 5 hours of television shouldn't be that hard, but we know they won't do that.

Easiest solution would be to just keep half the teams while the rest gets split to add depth for the lower and midcard scene of each brand. Based on Wikipedia, RAW currently has 8 teams while Smackdown has 9 teams but barely half are booked well and a few are not really teams.

I'd keep these teams and toss the rest:
The Bludgeon Brothers
Gable and Benjamin
The New Day
The Usos
The Authors of Pain
The Bar
Gallows and Anderson
The Revival

Maybe split Gable & Benjamin and add either Breezango or Titus Worldwide for a better face-heel balance.