![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Posts: 61,631
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I hate the idea of a PPV having two of the same type of matches. It dilutes the story of the match it's duplicating. Two MITB? Two Tag Team Titles? Two Women's Titles? They cannibalize each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: 52,478
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What they should do is have brand title matches alternate on the non major ppvs and have non title midcard matches for the other brand
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: 61,631
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's what I think. I mean, I'm not big on the brand split, but if you are going to do it, have your main event title matches or whatever, but don't do two Women's Title matches on the same show. If Ronda Rousey vs. Nia Jax is happening, then do Charlotte vs. Asuka without the belt. Then give SmackDown the Tag Title match and don't do a Raw Tag Title one.
|
|
|
|