![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Posts: 61,571
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is absolutely insane though. Not surprising, haha, but insane.
This is like trying to turn Daniel Bryan heel against Roman Reigns. Maybe not to that extreme, but it's clearly an insane idea that is asking people to walk their emotions to their opposite conclusions. And their logic. The logic of the turn isn't the thing that offends me. I don't care if a heel is right or wrong in their actions. It can be all about how someone acts. But it's the emotional lack of sense that is just flabbergasting. That being said, if this is used to make Becky the babyface and Charlotte is the entitled heel then this could sneak up on people brilliantly. But yeah, it's probably not good for Charlotte, who is who they want it to be good for. In a weird sort of way, even though she's not a heel, think of Ronda Rousey like heel Triple H in 2004/2005. Think of Charlotte as babyface Randy Orton. Becky Lynch is Batista. That's the only way that this is going to work out good for any of them. But they don't want that, and they know longer feel like they have to adapt their plans. So we'll see what this does to women's wrestling. Hey, equality -- it's got the right to be as detested and rejected as the men's. |
![]() |
![]() |