What WWE should do with Becky Lynch at Royal Rumble

[Fignuts]

Originally Posted by Noid I disagree with this. I think too much emphasis is placed on people wrestling long matches and all that sort of stuff. Given that the wins and losses are more important than how competitive you are, you can actually make justification for shorter matches. It wouldn't be "epic," but this is where you can do things like Mandy Rose vs. Sonya Deville on a SmackDown TV (say they haven't split), or get around to Sasha Banks vs. Bayley without turning one of them. You will get dross like Dana Brooke vs. Alicia Fox, but that will help the better stuff stand out. One of the most impenetrable things about the G1, for me, is that everything is "so good" that it blends together. And I kind of get sick of seeing the forearm exchange spot. In a broader way, I actually think the more fruity gimmicks of WWE would help a concept like this stand out. This I agree with. It's unfortunate, because they don't really know what to do with the men either.

So in other words you want a version of the G-1 that puts more emphasis on stories and character work rather than top quality wrestling. I don’t really trust WWE do that effectively.