Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dastardly One
Semantics. If it goes any further, I hope it's proven without a doubt that he's innocent of any wrongdoing.
But he's innocent until proven guilty because nothing has happened to him. And, if anything does happen to him, it should only be the result of due process and a proper investigation.
Really that simple, smart guy.
|
its a fundamental contradiction at its most basic level. If you are presumed innocent you require no proof to further it. Its assumed. You are by default 100% factually innocent.
This is one of those instances where you have a cognitive dissonance and you will refuse to be introspective on your own thought process. Perhaps you mispoke? Thats an easier scape goat.