![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
As far as the WWE is concerned, when was the last time that we saw a REAL good stable feud? I miss the days where we saw The Nation vs. Degeneration X. Stable feuds not only generate interest, but they also make more matches seem "meaningful" (since it adds to the storyline). Again - would anyone really have cared THAT much if someone like...........Mark Henry was "harassing" Chyna? (if there had been no "intense" DX/Nation rivalry). Same thing with the Corporate Ministry: I can still remember back in the day - whenever wrestlers such as Gangrel, Mideon, and Viscera would fight (on the "main" show of RAW or Smackdown), there would still be some interest (since these "jobbers" were associated with Vince McMahon and Undertaker). Think about Triple H. Did people care about him before or AFTER he joined up with Shawn Michaels in DX? The same can be said for Randy Orton and Dave Batista (and on Smackdown - Orlando Jordan, Luther Reigns, and Mark Jindrak). I guess the main reason why I created this topic (other than the fact that I was bored SHITLESS ![]() Granted - Evolution has pretty much ran its course (IMO - the best thing would be for the WWE to turn Batista face), but then what? My worst case scenerio, is that the WWE will have 3 or 4 "average/above average" storylines, but won't have that ONE major storyline in which the show revolves around (and in effect, helps to bring in ratings). |
|
![]() |
![]() |