WWE recognizes WCW history...

**The CyNick** · 01-03-2005, 09:46 PM

IC title was unified with the US title. That was promoted as a unification match. Therefore, I think the current version of the US title being used by SD does NOT have the lineage back to WCW. It only goes as far as Eddie winning the tourny against Benoit.

I think the lineage of the IC title is in tact because it was unified with the WHC under the watch of the RAW brand. And then was also back back into circulation by the same brand. Therefore, IMO that means the IC title maintains its lineage.

The RAW tag belts are the combination of the WCW and WWF tag title belts. Those two titles were also unified into one. The belts were on SD, but then moved over to RAW, but I would say they maintain their lineage as well. The SD tag titles only go back as far as the tounry in 02.

01-03-2005, 09:46 PM	#37
The CyNick Make the IWC Great Again Posts: 8,922	IC title was unified with the US title. That was promoted as a unification match. Therefore, I think the current version of the US title being used by SD does NOT have the lineage back to WCW. It only goes as far as Eddie winning the tourny against Benoit. I think the lineage of the IC title is in tact because it was unified with the WHC under the watch of the RAW brand. And then was also back back into circulation by the same brand. Therefore, IMO that means the IC title maintains its lineage. The RAW tag belts are the combination of the WCW and WWF tag title belts. Those two titles were also unified into one. The belts were on SD, but then moved over to RAW, but I would say they maintain their lineage as well. The SD tag titles only go back as far as the tounry in 02.