![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: ??? | |||
| Sara |
|
6 | 17.14% |
| Michelle McRibs |
|
13 | 37.14% |
| Some other broad |
|
5 | 14.29% |
| These seriously need to stop |
|
13 | 37.14% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 35. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Posts: 3,743
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Randy Orton as it appears he doesn't have anything to do at the moment and he's come a long way from the last time he faced him at Wrestlemania.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,397
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Cena faced Taker before when Taker was in his biker gimmick right? Not ever after though I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Posts: 4,839
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wade Barrett.
Foley, HHH and Orton have been done already. With the build that Barrett has had lately, I think he'd be an intriguing matchup for Taker and be someone the fans and smarks both would view as legit threats to break the streak. He did help Kane bury Taker and they had that one off encounter on Raw where Barrett gave Taker the Wasteland so there's a bit of favorable history for Barrett. It's fresh and intriguing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Is Finkle
Posts: 88,941
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Anyone but HHH please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
John Cena is the only answer to the question......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
king of sucks
Posts: 4,414
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i wonder if taker will be at this wrestlemania they need time to build a fued i can see him skipping it this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
It's a blood match!
Posts: 27,385
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
It's a blood match!
Posts: 27,385
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
'12 Tipsters Champ!
Posts: 2,359
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Shaq-Fu?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Posts: 399
![]()
|
Considering the Triple H v. Taker match last year stank, I'm really hoping NOT to have a repeat.
I think, if they do it to break the streak, it should be someone like a Wade Barret or a Shaemus. Cena doesn't need it, and any of the old names wouldn't be worth seeing. Including, much as I love him, Foley. |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,583
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't have high hopes for it to happen but I'd love to see "Orton v. Taker II" at WM XXVIII (I believe the first time they fought at Mania was WM 21).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
It's Mike O. What's Good?
Posts: 396
![]() ![]()
|
![]() Book it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Man of 1,004 Holds
Posts: 72
![]()
|
I enjoyed the thought of Foley vs. Taker, but the more I think about it, it just wouldn't be the match that anyone would be hoping for. I think we're going to see Triple H take on the streak again, but the rumors of Shawn Michaels as the ref seem possibly intriguing. I have loved The Undertaker since I started watching years ago, and I'm a fan of both Triple H and Michaels, and to me, having Michaels referee the match gives it that "impending screwjob" vibe, which I feel we haven't seen one of those that actually mattered in a bit. DX shenanigans could cost Undertaker the streak, but it wouldn't really hurt his rep, everyone would know he got screwed. OR this same scenario, but Undertaker beats the odds, which WOULD be a surprise considering the circumstances, and solidifies that 20-0 record. I agree that last year's match was far from the best, but the dynamic would be totally changed with Michaels refereeing. Could be cool, but who knows?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Jericho
Punk But I was thinking along the same lines as NBT, Barrett would make a great opponent. He only needs to come close to ending the streak to get the rub and that, in my opinion, is what the streak should be used for. Problem is, everybody is hung up on this "after HBK/HHH it needs to be another huge name" idea. Which is kinda baseless IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
His name is Jeff Harvey
Posts: 5,256
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Punk, Jericho, Orton, Triple H & Cena are the only ones that I think could have a big feel Mania type match with taker at this point
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,528
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Jericho would be the best match possible with the roster right now. Triple H is the obvious choice even tho they did absolutely everything in that match i really have no idea what they would do with a return match tbh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
It's Mike O. What's Good?
Posts: 396
![]() ![]()
|
^ Sorry James but that match did suck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,528
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i dunno, personally i was annoyed by the fact they spent 2/3s of the match doubled down but it was so fucking over...hard for me to say it sucked just because i didnt like it. and hell, if you get a match considered for MOTY when all you did wa slay on the mat for 30 min you must be doing somethign right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
It's Mike O. What's Good?
Posts: 396
![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
LOL true..I guess I was just so amped for it..and I cant help but compare it to Undertaker's bouts with HBK since it was somewhat part of the storyline. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
The Bush Muncher
Posts: 207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,528
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Posts: 52,478
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Punk Taker year long build to Taker's retirement match at WM 29. Either Punk ends the streak or no one does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
It's Mike O. What's Good?
Posts: 396
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Posts: 21,603
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm thinking the "new" Kane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Posts: 21,603
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Or Hornswoggle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
From a person who only JUST got back into wrestling.
Punk. If he wins, holy shit. They just cemented a young guy, known to be one of if not the best in the word as an elite main eventer until the day he retires. If he loses, we are still in for one hell of a match. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,528
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've said it before the streak really has no meaning if taker ever loses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Posts: 21,603
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nah no matter who it is, they won't win. Taker's last match won't be a loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Posts: 80
|
I haven't even thought of who else I'd like to see go up against the streak because it's blatantly obvious it's going to be Triple H/Undertaker III, which I'm totally okay with. Triple H/Undertaker last year was one of the matches that had me on the edge of my seat. It told a damn good story and anyone that says otherwise is lame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Shit buzz
Posts: 113
![]()
|
On watching it a second time, HHH vs. Taker from last year was a very good match. It was easy to underrate it first time round because we were all expecting so much...
Having said that - please let's not have HHH again. People are talking about HBK as ref but does anybody else hate the whole fucking concept of special guest referees? It doesn't make logical sense, it gets overused, and it does not hype the match itself. So I hope that doesn't happen at WM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Posts: 1,882
![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I forgot all about the Nexus interfering in the Buried Alive match! Now this would make for a good feud, as long as Barrett has a good explanation why he did it. Otunga did threatened to expose the real reason for the Nexus attacking him, and Barrett seemed... troubled. Still wonder what that was leading up to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Posts: 648
![]()
|
The rumoured matches look like Taker vs. HHH and Jericho vs. CM Punk...but I'd rather see CM Punk vs. HHH and Taker vs. Jericho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Posts: 305
![]()
|
Jericho is the obvious Choice at the Moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
I'm Awesome and Ur Not
Posts: 38
|
With alot of people saying Y2J Im thinking thats what Y2J was talking about when he said its the end of the world as we know it. So thionk about he would be the perfect fit and he has never faced taker at mania and they have chemistry together. So my vote goes to none other than Y2J Chris Jericho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Out Of Step
Posts: 12,059
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've never understood the argument for ending the streak,it only makes someone a star if they follow up with it. Its a huge risk to give someone the streak ending win only for them to do a Lesnar 6 months later,and 20-0 looks better on a dvd case than 19 -1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Posts: 1,711
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Either Barrett or The Miz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Daffanatic
Posts: 777
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would want to see Y2J or Punk vs Undertaker.
I really don't want to see HHH vs Undertaker for the third time....or Kane for that matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
ELF ANGEL
Posts: 39,476
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The Patriots know that pretty well.
|
|
|
|