![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I was waiting for you to bring up age. Batista is only about 5 years younger than Taker.
Also, great on adding ANOTHER wrestler (Triple H) who can get a good match out of a lot of people. Henry, though? ![]() HEY GUYS! HE THINKS A MARK HENRY MATCH WAS GREAT! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
As far as age, maybe Batista is just a bit younger than Taker, but your numeric age is not always your physical age. Batista is in great shape, he looks very young while Undertaker is in terrible shape he looks like an old man from a retirement home. Thus, Undertaker is OLD at heart and anyone who sees Taker immediately sees how he moves and that he is old. With Batista though? People are SHOCKED that he is as old as he is because he acts and looks so young, so its not about ur numeric age, its about ur physical age and in that respect, the difference between Batista and The Undertaker is HUGE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
#1 Senior Elite Member
Posts: 7,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
#1 Senior Elite Member
Posts: 7,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This thread is the equivalent of me walking into a black man's house and telling him that I have issues with the KKK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Taker is in MUCH better shape than Batista. Taker's had what, ONE big injury in a 20 year career? Batista has had at least two within 4 years.
Just because you're roided up and have the body of a body builder doesn't automatically make you in better physical shape. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
*Spoiler* Batista is much less experienced than Undertaker in the ring, so he makes more mistakes! It has nothing to do with how old he is, but it is his experience. Taker just has more thats why he doesnt get injured as much. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
But Taker wasn't seriously injured until recently, meaning he made a mistake as an experienced man! So clearly, since Taker managed to get through his early years, those analogous to Dancin' Dave's current status, without injuries. Are you saying he was a better wrestler than Bats? Probably not, but that's where your circular logic leads. Well, if you can call what you're using logic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
Hey, if Batista started around the same time as Taker he wouldnt have been injured either because it was a very low risk enviroment and style. I dont know if Taker was a better wrestler than Batista, its hard to compare because I have not seen much of Young Taker's work (since it was such a long time ago), but I am talking that today, Batista is the better wrestler because Taker is marred down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Quote:
(deep breath) BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Ummm...Sorry, what? Quote:
I'm better now. Really. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Sorry, that's just too funny. Taker used to be in matches with powerbombs and piledrivers and wrestling that was about fifteen times as stiff as WWE is now. It wasn't even the hardest wrestling around: WCW and ECW had much stiffer wrestling. But it was sure as fuck harder than the shit today. I know you're a joke account, so I'll just take this for what it's worth: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
#1 Senior Elite Member
Posts: 7,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
BTW, you know what would be AWESOME!!!111 A match with batista, henry, and for one night only bring back Hogan and Ultimate Warrior for a 4-Way Elimination match. let it go on 4 too hours and id be beyond cool bro.
4 realz!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
Oh wait yes you are, LOL, Henry is crap, Hogan is an old man, Warrior is an old man. Batista can carry Henry to a good match with his skill, but not all these turds. UGH. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
#1 Senior Elite Member
Posts: 7,887
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I'd bee sick!!!1111 SICQQQQQQQQQQQ!!!!1111111111111111111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
"Anyone else... 11-09-2007 05:51 PM TerryBoulder Dont post CRAP in my thread plz u elementary school KID."
lol Also, at least I passed first grade English class. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am arguing your points. And you just bring up more stupid counter points. It's not worth it.
Also, TPWW is notorious for thread hijacking. I take it you didn't read the forum before you joined... You don't know what you're into. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So essentially Taker sucks because he wrestles a different style. Nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Junior Member
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Taker debuted in WWE in 91. The bulk of his career happened in the hard hitting era.
Quote:
By your logic an old man can't carry someone else - physically or otherwise. So what about here? Michaels isn't in the best shape of his life, and apparently Taker is in the WORST shape (which is not true, he's probably in the best shape of his career). How did they manage to pull off one of the best Rumble finishes ever? Oh, I know, Batista carried them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
But we won't let reality get in the way of our argument, will we, Terry? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Posts: 2,513
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
1990. Just for the hell of making a markish point. What the hell with this guy though. He's arguing with his own logic really. Oh btw, back to his point about MVPs attire, MVP made a good point about that in an interview not so long ago when he said something along the lines of 'There are sweaty guys out there rolling around in speedos, and people are concerned with my attire?' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Less Talk, More Rokk!
Posts: 3,555
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wait, Mark Henry matches aren't great?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
The Year of the Bullet
Posts: 4,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This thread is priceless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Yasser "wheredat" Arabat
Posts: 3,381
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Posts: 1,290
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've been disappointed with the WWE for years and years and years. But then again, I'm British, so I'd be disappointed if I WASN'T disappointed. We Brits like to be let down so we have something to talk about at the pub.
|
|
|
|