![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Main eventer right there, along with Erik Watts and Rad Radford.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,469
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you are one clever bastard though
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That is not your definition. He main evented in a singles match! I don't see where it says he has to be one of the wrestlers...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,469
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It wasn't really a singles if it had all those guys in it though now is it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh, it's a singles match. They're part of the stipulation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,469
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
they're as a part of the match as the referee is. You gonna make a case for Earl Hebner too?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They're more than the match than the referee. Also a step above a manager or a corner man. They're like the steel cage or the ladder. In the singles match.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,469
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So you admit they're a prop?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A prop of main eventers!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,469
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm sorry, by your logic there are ladders that are main eventers. I have won this round of insane logic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it's safe to say that the ladder has proven itself to be a pretty reliable main eventer. It's never failed a drug test, it's always on time, puts over every one else to the belt...I think it's the ideal main eventer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Triple A
Posts: 133,040
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
He did gain a point for holding the title, but he was also on the losing side of a 3 man tag match last week on raw, so in effect it cancelled out a point change.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Triple A
Posts: 133,040
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh oh oh my fault. I thought it was +3 for holding a title for some reason. OK good stuff.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Pelvic Sorcerer
Posts: 64,762
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is +3 point for any midcard title, +4 for ECW or TNA World Title, +5 for WWE or WHC, for simply holding the title. You get +1 point a week for continuing to be champion. Also, if you lose a title you lose -1 a week till it reaches 0. Now if by chance you lose one title only to pick another one up, the weekly title counter continues to rise, which works nicely for Edge.
|
![]() |
![]() |