![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is more impressive? | |||
| THE Streak |
|
17 | 30.91% |
| The Mania Streak |
|
38 | 69.09% |
| Voters: 55. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
EATER OF HOT POCKETS
Posts: 14,340
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In or out of kayfabe, I think that a dominance that last close to two decades is still more impressive than a dominance that lasts a few years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Member
Posts: 555
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
fuck i dunno
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Got fired by the Clique
Posts: 3,206
|
If you ask me they didn't start making a big deal out of it until last WM 23 before that I didn't even know he was undefeated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
Posts: 555
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i always wanted sting to end takers streak
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Got fired by the Clique
Posts: 3,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Got fired by the Clique
Posts: 3,206
|
That could make some good money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Member
Posts: 555
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
how about kane vs a big penis i bet he wud job to it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Got fired by the Clique
Posts: 3,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Member
Posts: 555
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ya right u tried to bury bound 4 glory
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm going with the Mania streak. Goldberg's streak was impressive, but as has been stated, the majority of the matches were squashes against nobodies. When you add it all up, he probably only did about thirty minutes of solid work. Taker's streak may not have as staggering of a number, but when you consider that it is once a year and you look at some of the names he's beaten (HHH, Flair, Sid, Diesel) it's a pretty impressive list. Yeah, there have been some clunkers in there, but there haven't been in Barry Horowitz's either. Goldberg's streak was just a way to work his way up the ranks and earn a title shot. Taker's is now a way of earning immortality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Got fired by the Clique
Posts: 3,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Member
Posts: 555
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
starcade vs wrestlemania vs bound for glory
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Got fired by the Clique
Posts: 3,206
|
Nothing will ever be Wrestlemania period
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Posts: 4,834
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Kayfabe wise, the Undertaker's streak is more impressive because his streak is not already broken, or fabricated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Posts: 4,365
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Undertaker's streak is 16 going on 17. Also, Goldberg was facing very weak wrestlers a lot. Meanwhile, Taker had mostly top guys he had to face. I mean he did have some easy guys along the way, but the majority of then were tough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Got fired by the Clique
Posts: 3,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Skibbidy Lock Jaw
Posts: 88,878
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sid's Streak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Bringin' Back The Sexy
Posts: 8,470
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
When I first read Xero's question, my immediate thought was "oh come on, it has to be 'Taker".
But then we are talking "kayfabe" here. Whichever way you want to look at it, whether you think Goldberg's streak was fabricated (which of course it was) so too was 'Taker's streak. We are talking "kayfabe". And to me (who is NOT a Goldberg fan - however, I will admit that I was a little back in the early days of WCW) a winning streak of 200+ matches (whether against Hugh Morrus, Horace Hogan or Sid Viscious) would have to be at the very least AS impressive if not more so than 'Taker's 16-0 win record at Wrestlemania. Both "streaks" are of course fabricated. In "kayfabe", (as much as I hate to admit it) I would have to lean towards Goldberg. Last edited by KYR; 04-02-2009 at 01:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
of Goldberg's near 200 wins, over half were against jobbers and mid-card talent..... taker has beaten the likes of Sid, HHH, Flair, HBK (soon), Kane (twice), Batista, Edge, Diesel, etc..... easy call... Taker wins
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Skibbidy Lock Jaw
Posts: 88,878
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Golberg's Streak was a huge part of WCW at the time. Taker's Streak is just something that comes around once a year and until recent years wasn't really a main attraction of the show. Kayfabe and non-kayfabe wise, Goldberg's was better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|